上锁的房间

채명신 경기도의원, 경기국악원 지역밀착형 문화거점으로 활성화해야_我的网站

一 |     Last week, Israel's parliament voted to dissolve itself after the ruling Bloc of Change coalition had lost its paper-thin majority. Lapid, who served as the foreign minister in Bennett's cabinet and is also the leader of the largest opposition party Yesh Atid, assumed the office of prime minister until the next parliamentary elections scheduled for November. This will be the country's fifth snap vote in under four years.,The previous one took place in March 2021 after the parliament had dissolved itself due to the failure to adopt a state budget by the deadline. It ended with Lapid forming a coalition agreement with Bennett, who leads the right-wing Yamina political alliance, entailing a rotational two-year premiership.,Unique Coalition,The coalition created by Bennett and Lapid was the most diverse in Israel's history, consisting of parties that run the gamut from right to left, religious to secular, and even included an Arab party, the United Arab List (also known as Ra'am). Other coalition members included Yesh Atid, Yamina, Blue and White, Yisrael Beiteinu, New Hope, Labor and Meretz.,The coalition's diversity is explained by the shared desire to prevent Benjamin Netanyahu, the leader of the right-wing Likud party and a former prime minister, from once again taking power. However, the variety of political forces presented in the coalition also made it hard to sustain.,"The effort and the energy that were invested in maintaining the coalition government throughout this year actually exhausted the government and the people at the top, and they couldn’t really deal with certain issues that could have given them credit were they successful in surviving until the next elections," Tamar Hermann, a professor of political science at the Open University of Israel and academic director of the Viterbi Family Center for Public Opinion and Policy Research at the Israel Democracy Institute, said.,According to Itzhak Galnoor, a senior research fellow at the Van Leer Jerusalem Institute and emeritus Herbert Samuel professor of political science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, the Bennett-Lapid government should have invested much more effort in keeping the alliance together, which they failed to do.,"It was an attempt to save Israeli democracy, prevent corruption, show that a government can function without all those tricks and things that the Netanyahu government was notable for doing for many years. In this way, I mean the second part, they actually did succeed for a while. So, the main failure, as I said, was the problem of maintaining some politicians within the parties who knew exactly what they were getting into. It wasn’t just that the whole experiment was a failure, it was more of a personal thing," Galnoor said.,The expert also suggested that if the Arab political alliance Joint List, which was not part of the ruling coalition, had given its support to the government and overcome the personal animosity between them and the United Arab List then the coalition would have survived.,"So, it is difficult to say more than we have now personification of politics, which makes it very difficult to have a coalition and it does not matter even if we may have ten elections," Galnoor surmised.,Meanwhile, Liron Lavi, a lecturer and research fellow at the UCLA Y&S Nazarian Center for Israel Studies, drew attention to the changes in the Israeli political spectrum.,"'Right' and 'Left' are much less about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict- the main issue that has defined Israeli politics since 1967. Instead, the political axis in Israel is being re-shaped around issues of the state's Jewish identity and democracy," she stated, adding that "in light of this change, and until the political axis will be redefined and parties will realign themselves along it, we are expected to see more political instability in Israel in the near future.",Time for Change,The series of snap elections has revealed the issues with Israel's current electoral system, in which parliamentary seats are proportionally divided between parties and a ruling coalition must secure 61 seats in order to form a government. However, creation of a stable political coalition out of sprawling factions has become a daunting task. At the same time, parties are currently the least trusted political organizations in Israel, with people often having little idea what is the real difference between them, according to Hermann.,"Many parties do not even have platforms, so people vote by identification based on, as I said, the level of religiosity and past experience," Hermann explained. "The parties are, in a way, obsolete, but we don’t have any alternative channel for choosing the candidates for the national elections, so if the electoral system is changed, probably the parties will have to adapt and maybe become more relevant.",Galnoor, for his part, underscored the need to make sure the country has a stable government and ruling coalition, noting that the Israeli Democracy Institute suggested the following changes to the country's parliamentary system: making the head of the biggest party after the election the prime minister by default so they could form a governing coalition as well as introducing mixed elections, with some lawmakers representing geographic constituencies instead of being voted on via party lists.,"You have, let’s say, a member of the Knesset [who] represents the Negev, the south, he would have to represent all the people in the south. It would be Jewish and Arab and it would be Orthodox and non-Orthodox, so you would have a representative, a member of the Knesset, that cuts across the differences in society," the expert outlined the idea.,Shmuel Sandler, the professor emeritus of political science at Bar-Ilan University and a senior research fellow at the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies also called for electoral reform and hoped that a coalition without Netanyahu might implement it.,"He would try to go for a reform in which the head of the largest party is also elected as PM. But this does not assure stability," Sandler noted.。    ▲채명신 의원이 25일 도의회 중회의실에서 경기국악원 관계자들과 정담회를 열고 전통문화 프로그램 확대 및 접근성 개선 방안을 논의하고 있다. (사진=경기도의회)경기도의회가 도내 대표 전통공연 시설인 경기국악원의 이용 계층을 전 세대로 넓히고, 접근성 개선과 일몰 사업 재추진을 통해 지역밀착형 복합문화공간으로 재도약시키기 위한 방안 마련에 나섰다.경기도의회 문화체육관광위원회 채명신 의원(더불어민주당, 용인5)은 지난 25일 경기도의회 중회의실에서 경기국악원 관계자들과 정담회를 열고, 시설 운영 현황 점검과 함께 도민의 국악 향유 기회 확대를 위한 실질적인 정책 지원책을 논의했다.경기국악원은 전통예술 공연을 비롯해 다양한 교육·체험 프로그램을 운영하며 국악의 대중화와 도민의 문화 복지 증진을 이끄는 도의 핵심 전통문화예술 인프라다.이날 채명신 의원은 “현재 유아·어린이·학생을 대상으로 한 교육·체험 프로그램은 비교적 다양하게 운영되고 있지만, 지역주민과 중·장년층, 어르신이 일상적으로 참여할 수 있는 공연과 프로그램은 상대적으로 부족한 측면이 있다”고 짚었다. 이어 “기존 어린이·청소년 사업을 지속하면서도 성인과 노년층까지 아우르는 세대별 맞춤형 프로그램을 확대해 경기국악원의 이용 계층을 넓힐 필요가 있다”고 강조했다.아울러 채 의원은 예산 부족 등의 사유로 중단되거나 축소된 주요 사업의 효과성을 재평가할 필요가 있다고 지적했다. 채 의원은 “과거 운영했던 ‘우리동네 국악콘서트’와 같은 지역밀착형 사업이 주민들에게는 평가가 좋았는데 일몰되어 아쉬움이 든다”며 “사업 효과가 있었다면 재추진을 적극 검토할 필요가 있다”고 밝혔다.관람객의 편의를 위한 교통망 확충에 대해서도 언급했다. 채 의원은 “지역주민이 보다 편리하게 경기국악원을 찾을 수 있도록 주요 거점과 연계한 버스 운영 등 교통편 개선 방안을 검토할 필요가 있다”고 제안했다.끝으로 채명신 의원은 “경기국악원이 단순한 공연 관람 시설을 넘어 지역주민이 일상적으로 찾고 참여하는 전통문화 거점으로 자리매김해야 한다”며 “앞으로도 경기국악원과 지속적으로 소통하고, 용인의 다양한 문화·관광 자원과 연계해 지역주민의 문화 향유 기회를 확대하는 한편, 경기도를 대표하는 국악 전문 공연장으로 발전할 수 있도록 정책적 지원 방안을 적극 모색하겠다”고 말했다.。

二 |

Current article:http://4iupwun.xuanliaruamibinmilangca.shop/news/20260826_3247452.html

Published on:06:01:47